Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8585 13
Original file (NR8585 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 §. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490

 

BAN
Docket No:NRO8585-13

11 March 2014

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj : iF
Ref: (a) Title 10 u.S.c. 1552

Enel: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments

(2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/035
of 24 Jan 2014

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was
advanced to E-5/MM2 from the September 2012 Navy-wide
advancement exam.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and

George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 10 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined

. that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in

Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especiaily in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following

corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
as follows:

a. Petitioner was advanced to E-5/MM2 from the September
2012 Navy-wide advancement exam with an effective date of Y J

ay i = Time In Rate date of

b. That a copy of this Report of proceedings be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.

4. Pursuant to, Section 6{c) of the revised Procedures o£ the
Board for Correction of Naval Records {32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723,6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

, | rons d Leonie
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRONTE I. MONTGOMERY

Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it ig hereby ~
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on

pehalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

1lL March 2014

TRS Get

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4193 14

    Original file (NR4193 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his Time in Rate to E-5/MM2 be restored to March 2011 and that he was authorized to take the March 2014 E-6/JIM1 advancement examination. The Board, cons .sting of Ms. Davis, Ms. Wilcher and Mr. Grover reviewed Petitioner|s allegations of error and injustice on 15 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3533 14

    Original file (NR3533 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO3533-14 8 May 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: A a Ref: (a} Title 10 U.S.C. The Board determined the following factors militated in favor of relief: That Petitioner did pass the PFA before the limiting date, as required, that the CO endorsed Petitioner's selection for advancement by “frocking” him...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4169-13

    Original file (NR4169-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/MM2 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00938-09

    Original file (00938-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E5/MM2 from the March 2008, Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, ‘Zsalman, and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 November 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8640 13

    Original file (NR8640 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    _ DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 $, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No:NROQ8640-13 11 March 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: iia? Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/STS3 from the March 2011 Navy-wide...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9104 13

    Original file (NR9104 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/PS2 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3893 14

    Original file (NR3893 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to 5 advanced to B-5/MM2 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement | evele. Navy Personnel Command is directed to issue Petitioner a DD Form 215 to correct his effective date of rank and pay. 7, Bi Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for correction of Naval Records...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0322 14

    Original file (NR0322 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/ETl from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9380 13

    Original file (NR9380 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to IT2/E5 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8397 14

    Original file (NR8397 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §, COURTHOUSE RO SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO8&397-14 19 November 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy sub): es Ey Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner advanced to B-5/MM2 from the...